| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | darrenk(at)insightdist(dot)com (Darren King) |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] include/config.h FOLLOWUP |
| Date: | 1998-01-05 13:13:49 |
| Message-ID: | 199801051313.IAA05939@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> > On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Vadim B. Mikheev wrote:
> >
> > > Just remember that Informix (and others) use 2K blocks.
> >
> > So we're 4x what the commercial ones are as of right now?
> >
>
> (All of this is taken from their respective web site docs)
>
> block size max tuple size
> IBM DB2 4K 4005 bytes
> Sybase 2K 2016 bytes
> Informix 2K 32767 bytes
> Oracle (left my Oracle books at home...oops)
Wow, I guess we are not as bad as I thought. If Peter gets large
objects working properly, we can close this issue.
--
Bruce Momjian
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Goran Thyni | 1998-01-05 13:28:25 | Re: [HACKERS] subselect |
| Previous Message | Vadim B. Mikheev | 1998-01-05 12:35:59 | Re: [HACKERS] subselect |