Re: unused_oids script is broken with bsd sed

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, andreas(at)proxel(dot)se, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unused_oids script is broken with bsd sed
Date: 2018-04-25 20:08:03
Message-ID: 19973.1524686883@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Just after you posted, I sent a patch that tweaks the API of
> Catalog.pm for toast and index oids. If you use that API in your
> patch, you can get rid of the extra bookkeeping you added for those
> oids.

I've adjusted these two patches to play together, and pushed them.

> The original scripts skipped the relation and rowtype oids for
> bootstrap catalogs. You've replaced that with two data-level tests for
> pg_class plus pg_type composite types. I think the original test was a
> bit cleaner in this regard.

Yeah, I thought so too. Changed.

> For those following along, these scripts still assume we're in the
> catalog directory. I can hack on that part tomorrow if no one else
> has.

I didn't touch this point.

I notice that duplicate_oids is now a good factor of 10 slower than it was
before (~0.04 sec to ~0.4 sec, on my machine). While this doesn't seem
like a problem for manual use, it seems annoying as part of the standard
build process, especially on slower buildfarm critters. I think we should
do what you said upthread and teach genbki.pl to complain about duplicate
oids, so that we can remove duplicate_oids from the build process.

I went ahead and pushed things as-is so we can confirm that duplicate_oids
has no portability issues that the buildfarm could find. But let's try
to get the build process change in place after a day or so.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2018-04-25 20:09:25 Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-04-25 20:00:52 Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data