| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>, PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: REFERENCES privilege should not be symmetric (was Re: [GENERAL] Postgres Permissions Article) |
| Date: | 2017-03-31 21:24:02 |
| Message-ID: | 19810.1490995442@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I think the benefit is reduction of user confusion. Admittedly, since
>> Paul is the first person I can remember ever having complained about it,
>> maybe nobody else is confused.
> After going back-and-forth on this (and not being able to independently
> come to the conclusion that what we are adhering to is actually a typo) I'm
> going to toss my +1 in with Robert's.
OK, the consensus seems clearly against changing this in the back branches,
so I'll just fix it in HEAD.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | kbrannen | 2017-03-31 21:45:18 | Re: Confusing order by error |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2017-03-31 19:50:39 | Re: Confusing order by error |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2017-03-31 21:33:01 | Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-03-31 20:57:53 | Re: Foreign tables don't enforce the partition constraint |