Re: Reinitialize stack base after fork (for the benefit of rr)?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reinitialize stack base after fork (for the benefit of rr)?
Date: 2020-03-27 18:59:56
Message-ID: 19797.1585335596@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2020-03-27 14:34:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>>> Tom, while imo not a fix of the right magnitude here: Are you planning /
>>> hoping to work again on your postmaster latch patch?

>> Um ... -ESWAPPEDOUT. What are you thinking of?

> https://postgr.es/m/18193.1492793404%40sss.pgh.pa.us

Oh, I thought we'd dropped that line of thinking in favor of trying
to not do work in the postmaster signal handlers (i.e. I thought *you*
were pushing this forward, not me).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2020-03-27 19:04:29 Re: error context for vacuum to include block number
Previous Message Robert Haas 2020-03-27 18:53:10 Re: backup manifests