Re: Why does backend send buffer size hardcoded at 8KB?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Artemiy Ryabinkov <getlag(at)ya(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why does backend send buffer size hardcoded at 8KB?
Date: 2019-07-27 15:09:06
Message-ID: 19796.1564240146@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Artemiy Ryabinkov <getlag(at)ya(dot)ru> writes:
> Does it make sense to make this parameter configurable?

Not without some proof that it makes a performance difference on
common setups (which you've not provided).

Even with some proof, I'm not sure I'd bother with exposing a
user-tunable knob, as opposed to just making the buffer bigger.
We have far too many GUCs already.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message farjad.farid 2019-07-27 16:49:02 RE: Hardware for writing/updating 12,000,000 rows per hour
Previous Message Artemiy Ryabinkov 2019-07-27 11:43:54 Why does backend send buffer size hardcoded at 8KB?