Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I'm still confused by the comment I was reacting to - the code
> explicitly is about creating the *shared* resowner:
Right, this is because of the choice I mentioned earlier about creating
this resowner the same way as the one for the inline case. I guess the
comments could go into more detail. Or we could make the parentage
different for the two cases, but I don't like that much.
regards, tom lane