Re: PG vs macOS Mojave

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG vs macOS Mojave
Date: 2018-09-25 15:14:12
Message-ID: 19767.1537888452@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 4:49 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I've tested this on all the macOS versions I have at hand, and it
>> doesn't seem to break anything. Only part (1) could possibly
>> affect other platforms, and that seems safe enough.
>>
>> I'd like to commit and backpatch this, because otherwise longfin
>> is going to start falling over when I upgrade its host to Mojave.

> Looks good on this 10.13.4 system. About to upgrade to 10.14...

Thanks for testing! I'll set to work on back-patching that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-09-25 15:48:29 Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2018-09-25 15:08:00 Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option