Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Curtis Faith" <curtis(at)galtair(dot)com>
Cc: "Pgsql-Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes
Date: 2002-10-08 14:41:43
Message-ID: 1976.1034088103@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Curtis Faith" <curtis(at)galtair(dot)com> writes:
> Successive writes would write different NON-OVERLAPPING sections of the
> same log buffer. It wouldn't make sense to send three separate copies of
> the entire block. That could indeed cause problems.

So you're going to undo the code's present property that all writes are
block-sized? Aren't you worried about incurring page-in reads because
the kernel can't know that we don't care about data beyond what we've
written so far in the block?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shridhar Daithankar 2002-10-08 14:41:47 Re: [GENERAL] Large databases, performance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-10-08 14:38:02 Re: [GENERAL] Large databases, performance