Is user_catalog_table sensible for matviews?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Is user_catalog_table sensible for matviews?
Date: 2016-11-09 17:17:42
Message-ID: 19749.1478711862@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The system will let you set the "user_catalog_table" reloption to "true"
on a materialized view. Is this sensible, or is it a bug caused by the
fact that reloptions.c fails to distinguish matviews from heaps at all?

If it is sensible, then I broke it in e3e66d8a9 ...

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Nullmeier 2016-11-09 17:54:58 Re: Incorrect overflow check condition for WAL segment size
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-11-09 17:11:57 Re: Hash Indexes