| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, John Gray <jgray(at)azuli(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Refactoring of command.c |
| Date: | 2002-02-27 05:03:17 |
| Message-ID: | 19747.1014786197@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> John Gray writes:
> dbcommands.c rename to database.c (see below)
> indexcmds.c rename to index.c (see below)
>>
>> Might as well keep these. They don't hurt anyone just because they spell
>> a little differently.
> I disagree. If we are cleaning, let's clean. *cmd* is redundant. The
> contents of the files will be quite different anyway.
But if we rename them, we will lose CVS history for the files (unless we
jump through hoops that typically are not jumped through). I agree with
Peter: do not rename files simply to have slightly simpler file names.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-27 05:19:37 | Re: Rename sequence bug/feature |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2002-02-27 04:52:00 | Re: eWeek Poll: Which database is most critical to your |