Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jakub Wartak <Jakub(dot)Wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
Date: 2021-12-29 05:27:57
Message-ID: 1974328.1640755677@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> FWIW I don't think we include updates to typedefs.list in patches.

> Seems pretty harmless? And useful to keep around in development
> branches because I like to pgindent stuff...

As far as that goes, my habit is to pull down
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/typedefs.pl
on a regular basis and pgindent against that. There have been
some discussions about formalizing that process a bit more,
but we've not come to any conclusions.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message rajesh singarapu 2021-12-29 06:18:04 Converting WAL to SQL
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2021-12-29 04:29:52 Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)