Re: pg_upgrade (12->14) fails on aggregate

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Vejsada <pve(at)paymorrow(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade (12->14) fails on aggregate
Date: 2022-07-05 17:07:48
Message-ID: 1974222.1657040868@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> writes:
> The patch is marked WiP, what is in progress as of now?

It looks about ready to me. Pushed with some minor cosmetic
adjustments.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2022-07-05 19:25:43 Re: PostgreSQL 10 initdb with locale de-x-icu fails on Windows Server 2012
Previous Message ROSESOFT S. Hoffmann 2022-07-05 13:29:10 AW: PostgreSQL 10 initdb with locale de-x-icu fails on Windows Server 2012

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2022-07-05 17:24:55 Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-07-05 16:59:42 Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: pg_upgrade can result in early wraparound on databases with high transaction load