From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: installcheck failing on psql_crosstab |
Date: | 2016-06-07 14:30:18 |
Message-ID: | 1974.1465309818@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:28 AM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Hmm, so we could solve the complaint by adding an ANALYZE. I'm open to
>>> that; other opinions?
>> We could just enforce work_mem to 64kB and then reset it.
> Or just set up work_mem to a wanted value for the duration of the run
> of psql_crosstab. Attached is my proposal.
I liked the ANALYZE idea better; this seems pretty ad-hoc.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-06-07 14:41:43 | Re: Why we don't have checksums on clog files |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-07 14:20:44 | Re: Re: pg9.6 segfault using simple query (related to use fk for join estimates) |