Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> But if you're just looking up a single record I wouldn't expect it to be much
> faster to look it up in the smaller partial index than in the larger index.
> Indexes find records in log(n) time and log() grows awfully slowly.
Yeah. Given the proportions mentioned in the original message, I think
one index on the whole table and one on just the ICMP records is
probably the best solution. A partial index covering most of a table is
not going to win enough to justify its maintenance overhead.
regards, tom lane