Re: Slightly inconsistent behaviour in regproc?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Slightly inconsistent behaviour in regproc?
Date: 2003-10-28 05:35:09
Message-ID: 19679.1067319309@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Only regproc adds the unnecessary pg_catalog. qualification, why is that?

Er, I couldn't see the part of your example where that happened?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-10-28 05:40:39 Re: Duplicating transaction information in indexes and
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-28 05:02:01 Re: Open items