Re: Re: proposal: a width specification for s specifier (format function), fix behave when positional and ordered placeholders are used

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com, dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: proposal: a width specification for s specifier (format function), fix behave when positional and ordered placeholders are used
Date: 2013-03-15 03:00:38
Message-ID: 19631.1363316438@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> [ format-width-20130305.patch ]

Applied with some mostly-cosmetic adjustments. I also took the liberty
of changing some of the error message texts to line up more closely
with the expanded documentation (eg, use "format specifier" not
"conversion specifier" because that's the phrase used in the docs).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-03-15 03:07:33 Re: postgres_fdw vs data formatting GUCs (was Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2013-03-15 02:25:53 Assertion failure when promoting node by deleting recovery.conf and restart node