Re: PSA: we lack TAP test coverage on NetBSD and OpenBSD

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mikael Kjellström <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)mksoft(dot)nu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PSA: we lack TAP test coverage on NetBSD and OpenBSD
Date: 2019-01-17 23:31:27
Message-ID: 19616.1547767887@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

=?UTF-8?Q?Mikael_Kjellstr=c3=b6m?= <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)mksoft(dot)nu> writes:
> And now also the NetBSD machine failed on pgbenchCheck.

Indeed, as expected.

> should I leave it as it is for now?

Please. I'll push a fix for the broken test case in a bit --- I
just wanted to confirm that somebody else's machines agreed that
it's broken.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-01-17 23:33:06 Re: [PATCH] get rid of StdRdOptions, use individual binary reloptions representation for each relation kind instead
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-01-17 23:20:51 Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)