Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Basic subtransaction facility

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Basic subtransaction facility
Date: 2004-04-18 15:29:05
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> If you want.  When not #defined, the behavior is the same as the current
> code, so it shouldn't affect anything.  However I posted mainly so
> people could comment on the modifications, and maybe Heikki Linnakangas
> could see how it affects his two phase commit patch.

I have not reviewed it yet, but would like to do so before it goes in.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: ssingerDate: 2004-04-18 16:02:24
Subject: contrib/dbmirror
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-04-18 15:27:51
Subject: Re: guc variables flags explicitly initialisation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group