Re: Basic subtransaction facility

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Basic subtransaction facility
Date: 2004-04-18 15:29:05
Message-ID: 19607.1082302145@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> If you want. When not #defined, the behavior is the same as the current
> code, so it shouldn't affect anything. However I posted mainly so
> people could comment on the modifications, and maybe Heikki Linnakangas
> could see how it affects his two phase commit patch.

I have not reviewed it yet, but would like to do so before it goes in.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ssinger 2004-04-18 16:02:24 contrib/dbmirror
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-04-18 15:27:51 Re: guc variables flags explicitly initialisation