Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread
Date: 2026-07-08 18:34:52
Message-ID: 1959434.1783535692@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> RHEL/Rocky/Alma/CentOS Stream 9 (EoS 2027, EoL 2032/2035)
> - Python 3.9 to 3.12+
> - OpenSSL 3.0 (3.2? 3.5?)

As far as that goes: my RHEL9 machine, with a perfectly vanilla
install, has

$ rpm -q python3
python3-3.9.25-7.el9_8.x86_64
$ rpm -q openssl
openssl-3.5.5-4.el9_8.x86_64

So in the Red Hat universe I think we could safely expect a minimum
of OpenSSL 3.5. But that doesn't matter much given that your list
shows other LTS distros still on 3.0.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2026-07-08 18:40:48 Re: [PATCH] Add RetrieveInstrumentation hook for CustomScan providers
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2026-07-08 18:32:06 Re: SPLIT/MERGE use of is_internal=true