Re: PostgreSQL12 and older versions of OpenSSL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL12 and older versions of OpenSSL
Date: 2019-09-24 15:25:30
Message-ID: 19585.1569338730@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> ... I wonder if we should really continue to support
> OpenSSL 0.9.8.

Fair question, but post-rc1 is no time to be moving that goalpost
for the v12 branch.

> Anyway I suppose it's not impossible that third parties are still
> maintaining their 1.0.0 branch,

Another data point on that is that Red Hat is still supporting
1.0.1e in RHEL6. I don't think we should assume that just because
OpenSSL upstream has dropped support for a branch, it no longer
exists in the wild.

Having said that, if it makes our lives noticeably easier to
drop support for 0.9.8 in HEAD, I won't stand in the way.

(We should survey the buildfarm and see what the older critters
are running, perhaps.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Antonin Houska 2019-09-24 15:33:24 Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page
Previous Message Nikolay Shaplov 2019-09-24 15:20:31 Re: [PATCH] src/test/modules/dummy_index -- way to test reloptions from inside of access method