Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal

From: Giles Lean <giles(at)nemeton(dot)com(dot)au>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal
Date: 2001-10-01 21:57:10
Message-ID: 19555.1001973430@nemeton.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> From postmaster startup, by default, could we try larger amounts of
> buffer memory until it fails then back off and allocate that? Seems
> like a nice default to me.

So performance would vary depending on the amount of shared memory
that could be allocated at startup? Not a good idea IMHO.

Regards,

Giles

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-10-01 22:07:57 Re: iscachable settings for datetime functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-10-01 21:57:02 Re: cvs problem