| From: | "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dave Held" <dave(dot)held(at)arrayservicesgrp(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ARC patent |
| Date: | 2005-04-01 18:50:35 |
| Message-ID: | 19535.24.91.171.78.1112381435.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marian POPESCU [mailto:softexpert(at)libertysurf(dot)fr]
>> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 8:06 AM
>> To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
>> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ARC patent
>>
>> >>>Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>FYI, IBM has applied for a patent on ARC (AFAICS the
>> >>>>patent application is still pending, although the USPTO
>> >>>>site is a little hard to grok):
>> >>>
>> >>>Ugh. We could hope that the patent wouldn't be granted,
>> >>>but I think it unlikely, unless Jan is aware of prior art
>> >>>(like a publication predating the filing date). I fear we'll
>> >>>have to change or remove that code.
>
> Why not just ask IBM for a free license first? After all, they put
> 1,000+ patents in the public domain or something, didn't they?
Did you ever get the feeling you've seen or done something before? It's
like dejavu all over again.
:-)
It is april 1st, after all.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-01 20:55:47 | Re: SRF's + SPI |
| Previous Message | Eric B.Ridge | 2005-04-01 18:25:21 | SRF's + SPI |