| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: libpqxx |
| Date: | 2002-08-11 19:21:04 |
| Message-ID: | 19524.1029093664@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> The problem I see now is that libpqxx has a completely different build
> system and documentation system.
Unless someone's going to do the work to integrate libpqxx into our
build/documentation system, I have to agree with Peter: it should not
be part of our core distribution.
Since Marc's been moaning about bloat, I'm sure he'll vote for pulling
both libpq++ and libpqxx from the core distro and making them separate
packages. This would be okay with me.
However: making libpq++ buildable standalone would take some work too.
Any way you slice it, we need some work here... any volunteers?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-08-11 19:29:51 | Re: python patch |
| Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2002-08-11 18:24:15 | Re: [SECURITY] DoS attack on backend possible (was: Re: |