Re: make check failure for 8.4.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Greg Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: make check failure for 8.4.0
Date: 2009-07-18 17:41:15
Message-ID: 19488.1247938875@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> Bingo! A few weeks back I had been experimenting with using the PGXS
> compiles for our extensions, rather than expanding our tarballs in the
> build tree and just doing make and sudo make install there. On the
> failing machine, the session I used has USE_PGXS defined.

Hah. I wonder whether it's possible for an in-tree build to
intentionally undefine that? We could do something like
override USE_PGXS :=
in contrib/Makefile but I'm not sure if that results in the
variable being "undefined".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-07-18 18:05:36 Re: make check failure for 8.4.0
Previous Message Alan Li 2009-07-18 17:35:52 Re: MIN/MAX optimization for partitioned table