Re: date formatting and tab-complete patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Manuel Sugawara <masm(at)fciencias(dot)unam(dot)mx>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: date formatting and tab-complete patch
Date: 2001-12-03 22:09:23
Message-ID: 19435.1007417363@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Manuel Sugawara <masm(at)fciencias(dot)unam(dot)mx> writes:
> That's OK for me, since I already maintain my own version of postgres
> with "features" that may not be useful for every one, or not
> acceptable due "backwards compatibility" constrains. However waiting
> about a year for those small changes to appear in the official
> release is, IMHO, too much waiting :-(.

The interval between major versions is supposed to be 4 months or so,
not a year. I admit we've had pretty awful luck at keeping to schedule
the past couple of cycles --- but that's not a reason to change the
schedule target, and definitely not a reason to cause the schedule to
slip more by ignoring the feature-freeze rule after beta starts.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-12-03 22:12:59 Re: 7.1.3 not using index
Previous Message Mark Knox 2001-12-03 21:58:59 Re: Second call for platform testing

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Henry B. Hotz 2001-12-04 00:03:45 7.1.3 fails to configure on Solaris 2.7
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-12-03 21:17:42 Re: date formatting and tab-complete patch