| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RC1 on Friday? |
| Date: | 2002-11-07 15:20:13 |
| Message-ID: | 19419.1036682413@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> Tom, my understanding is that CONVERT stuff required an initdb, and was
> also the only thing 'critical' that went in ... correct? What impact does
> that have? For instance, could it cause one of the regression tests to
> fail, or is it something that is relatively benign?
I would like to think it's a pretty safe change, but that's why we do
betas ;-).
More seriously, we are still attacking various portability issues, and
there is still some undone docs work. I doubt we can make a tarball
tomorrow that is an honest release candidate. Maybe Monday?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-07 15:21:25 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2002-11-07 15:14:47 | Re: [ pgsql-monitoring ] |