Re: Bumping block size to 16K on FreeBSD...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Swan <tswan(at)idigx(dot)com>
Cc: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bumping block size to 16K on FreeBSD...
Date: 2003-08-28 20:51:11
Message-ID: 19387.1062103871@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Swan <tswan(at)idigx(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm a little uncomfortable with introducing a cross-platform variation
>> in the standard block size.
>>
> Has anyone looked at changing the default block size across the board
> and what the performance improvements/penalties might be? Hardware has
> changed quite a bit over the years.

Not that I know of. That might actually be a more reasonable proposal
than changing it only on one platform. It would take a fair amount
of legwork to generate enough evidence to convince people, though ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2003-08-28 20:52:32 Re: New array functions
Previous Message Joe Conway 2003-08-28 20:51:09 Re: New array functions