Re: pg_dump with tables created in schemas created by extensions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump with tables created in schemas created by extensions
Date: 2016-09-08 17:17:05
Message-ID: 19374.1473355025@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 5:43 AM, Martn Marqus <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> This is v4 of the patch, which is actually a cleaner version from the
>> v2 one Michael sent.

> Let's do as you suggest then, and just focus on the schema issue. I
> just had an extra look at the patch and it looks fine to me. So the
> patch is now switched as ready for committer.

Pushed with cosmetic adjustments (mainly, I thought the comment needed
to be much more explicit).

I'm not sure whether we want to try to fix this in older branches.
It would be a significantly larger patch, and maybe more of a behavior
change than we want to make in stable branches. So I'm inclined to call
it done at this point.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Freire 2016-09-08 17:18:49 Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-09-08 17:13:21 Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)