Re: logical decoding of two-phase transactions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date: 2017-05-13 20:22:34
Message-ID: 19307.1494706954@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Just a note about this patch. Of course time flies by and it needs rebase,
> but also there are few failing tests right now:

> ERROR: function pg_wal_lsn_diff(pg_lsn, unknown) does not exist

Apparently you are not testing against current HEAD. That's been there
since d10c626de (a whole two days now ;-)).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-05-13 20:23:31 Re: snapbuild woes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-05-13 20:20:04 Re: issue: record or row variable cannot be part of multiple-item INTO list