Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]

From: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath2133(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Date: 2026-04-07 09:35:50
Message-ID: 193024.1775554550@localhost
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:

> On 2026-Apr-07, Antonin Houska wrote:
>
> > I haven't thought of this explanation because BufFileWrite() only copies the
> > data to a buffer in the BufFile structure and BufFileDumpBuffer() writes the
> > buffer. Maybe valgrind is able to track the copying?
>
> Yeah, apparently it keeps track of tainted bytes somehow. Clever.
>
> The change to palloc0() that I was proposing did not fix the problem,
> because the stack allocated struct overwrote those zeroes with the
> uninitialized padding bytes.
>
> I ended up with an equivalent fix to Srinath's -- zero-initializing
> the stack-allocated struct, so that the bytes that end up copied by
> memcpy() are all defined. Srinath confirmed that in his environment the
> valgrind failure goes away, so I think we're good.

Thanks!

--
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Antonin Houska 2026-04-07 09:39:12 Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2026-04-07 09:32:28 Re: EXPLAIN: showing ReadStream / prefetch stats