| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alex Zepeda <zipzippy(at)sonic(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Exclude constraint problem |
| Date: | 2010-08-30 23:40:14 |
| Message-ID: | 19262.1283211614@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 14:05 -0700, Alex Zepeda wrote:
>> I dumped a table with an exclude constraint with pg_dump, and loaded it
>> into another instance of postgres where it promptly failed to create the
>> constraint. The complaint was... key conflicts with key. IOW,
>> duplicate data.
> If you dump a floating-point value, and then reload it, it may be
> different than the one you started with.
That's really *not* supposed to happen, assuming that both machines have
IEEE float arithmetic and competently written float I/O code.
My own WAG is that we're talking about a GiST bug that causes it to
recognize or not recognize duplicates depending on order of insertion.
But that's theorizing far in advance of the data.
> If you are not using floating point values, please try to make a
> self-contained test case that includes data that can reproduce the
> problem.
Yeah, a test case would be awfully helpful here.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex Zepeda | 2010-08-30 23:58:16 | Re: Exclude constraint problem |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-30 23:32:57 | Re: Exclude constraint problem |