Re: Building Postgresql under Windows question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Building Postgresql under Windows question
Date: 2009-04-28 22:21:04
Message-ID: 19256.1240957264@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> writes:
>> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net]

>> Why won't
>> PQstatus(conn) == CONNECTION_OK
>> be true and thus the code will succeed without requiring a password?

> It returns the value CONNECTION_STARTED

It certainly shouldn't. You're effectively asserting that PQconnectdb
is broken for everyone on every platform, which is demonstrably not the
case. Are you fooling with modified libpq code by any chance?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gurjeet Singh 2009-04-29 03:30:49 User documentation on signal handling
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-04-28 21:58:51 Re: docs: mention autovacuum when ANALYZE is recommended