Re: [PATCHES] WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements
Date: 2007-02-20 03:44:06
Message-ID: 19253.1171943046@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> writes:
> A workable syntax might be
> INSERT INTO "pg_log" ...

Why is this still under discussion? I thought we'd agreed that COPY
format was the way to go.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-20 03:49:27 Re: pgsql: Fix for plpython functions; return true/false for boolean,
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-02-20 03:39:40 Re: New feature request: FlashBack Query

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-20 03:46:35 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2913: Subscript on multidimensional array yields no value
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-02-20 03:25:21 WIP: replacing executor's use of Query with a PlannedStmt node type