Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Date: 2020-04-14 14:52:59
Message-ID: 19227.1586875979@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> writes:
> That said, I agree with that quite many of our tables right now are
> ugly, but I prefer ugly to hard to read. For me the mix of having every
> third row split into two fields makes the tables very hard to read. I
> have a hard time seeing which rows belong to which function.

Did you look at the variants without that discussed downthread?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-04-14 14:59:53 Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Previous Message Andreas Karlsson 2020-04-14 14:39:44 Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?