Re: Build-farm - intermittent error in 031_column_list.pl

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Build-farm - intermittent error in 031_column_list.pl
Date: 2022-05-25 14:28:05
Message-ID: 1922397.1653488885@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> The other aspect I dislike is that we just stop caching publication
> info, forcing us to reload it for every replicated change/row.

Ouch --- that seems likely to be completely horrid. At the very least
I'd want to see some benchmark numbers before concluding we could
live with that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Japin Li 2022-05-25 14:34:42 Invalid memory alloc request size for repeat()
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-05-25 14:25:33 Re: "ERROR: latch already owned" on gharial