| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table |
| Date: | 2017-06-08 21:18:05 |
| Message-ID: | 19210.1496956685@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I don't really like either option, because, on the one hand, this is a
> pretty invasive thing to go rip out -- maybe we don't have to rip out
> the entire patch series, but just some of the later patches? -- and on
> the other hand, keeping it in the tree will require work, and I'm
> busy. But there don't seem to be any other options.
I was wondering if we could simply remove the syntax (and documentation),
and leave the infrastructure in place until things are fixed. I think
everybody wants this feature, there's just concern about stabilizing it
in time for v10.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-06-08 21:57:19 | Re: walsender termination error messages worse in v10 |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-06-08 21:15:29 | Re: PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table |