|From:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>|
|To:||Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>|
|Subject:||Re: Extending outfuncs support to utility statements|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
> There might be enough node types that are raw-parse-tree-only,
> but not involved in utility statements, to make it worth
> continuing to suppress readfuncs support for them. But I kinda
> doubt it. I'll try to get some numbers later today.
Granting that we want write/read support for utility statements,
it seems that what we can save by suppressing raw-parse-tree-only
nodes is only about 10kB. That's clearly not worth troubling over
in the grand scheme of things, so I suggest that we just open the
floodgates as attached.
regards, tom lane
|Next Message||Andres Freund||2022-07-12 22:02:53||Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits|
|Previous Message||Tom Lane||2022-07-12 21:24:15||Re: System catalog documentation chapter|