| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Extending outfuncs support to utility statements |
| Date: | 2022-07-12 22:01:39 |
| Message-ID: | 1919681.1657663299@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> There might be enough node types that are raw-parse-tree-only,
> but not involved in utility statements, to make it worth
> continuing to suppress readfuncs support for them. But I kinda
> doubt it. I'll try to get some numbers later today.
Granting that we want write/read support for utility statements,
it seems that what we can save by suppressing raw-parse-tree-only
nodes is only about 10kB. That's clearly not worth troubling over
in the grand scheme of things, so I suggest that we just open the
floodgates as attached.
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| remove-remaining-outfunc-readfunc-suppression-hacks.patch | text/x-diff | 8.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-07-12 22:02:53 | Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-07-12 21:24:15 | Re: System catalog documentation chapter |