Re: Extending outfuncs support to utility statements

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Extending outfuncs support to utility statements
Date: 2022-07-12 22:01:39
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> There might be enough node types that are raw-parse-tree-only,
> but not involved in utility statements, to make it worth
> continuing to suppress readfuncs support for them. But I kinda
> doubt it. I'll try to get some numbers later today.

Granting that we want write/read support for utility statements,
it seems that what we can save by suppressing raw-parse-tree-only
nodes is only about 10kB. That's clearly not worth troubling over
in the grand scheme of things, so I suggest that we just open the
floodgates as attached.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
remove-remaining-outfunc-readfunc-suppression-hacks.patch text/x-diff 8.0 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-07-12 22:02:53 Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-07-12 21:24:15 Re: System catalog documentation chapter