| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [Review] Re: minor patch submission: CREATE CAST ... AS EXPLICIT |
| Date: | 2013-07-16 22:12:09 |
| Message-ID: | 1914.1374012729@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> On 07/09/2013 01:10 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>>> Where are we with this patch? Fabien, are you going to submit an
>>> updated version which addresses the objections, or should I mark it
>>> Returned With Feedback?
>> There is no need for an updated patch. I addressed the objections with
>> words, not code:-)
> So, Tom, Robert, Cedric: can we have a verdict? Commit or no?
My vote is still no, because of (1) the keyword-creep issue, and
(2) the fact that this is proposing to invent non-standard syntax
for functionality that's in the SQL standard.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-07-16 22:14:20 | [9.4 CF 1] SDO: Patches for Review |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-07-16 21:58:40 | Re: [Review] Re: minor patch submission: CREATE CAST ... AS EXPLICIT |