| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: typcache.c typos |
| Date: | 2018-08-28 13:39:46 |
| Message-ID: | 19132.1535463586@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 28 August 2018 at 16:40, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> I've attached a patch to fix a typo in typcache.c. I ended up also
>> rephrasing the sentence since "information about data types that is",
>> almost made me also want to change "is" to "are", since "types" is
>> plural. That would have been a mistake since it's talking about the
>> information and not the types.
> Opps. I mistakenly attached the incorrect patch. The correct one is
> attached to this email.
I don't see any typos here; it looks to me more like a difference of
opinion about whether "information" is singular or plural. I don't
really feel a need to change the existing wording.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2018-08-28 14:03:15 | Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-08-28 13:37:08 | Re: Why hash OIDs? |