Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index?
Date: 2018-10-24 09:21:11
Message-ID: 19088.1540372871@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> writes:
> If I have a substantial database dump file to provide for reproducing this
> do you prefer it on a web server somewhere? I expect that mailing very
> large attachments to the lists is a bad idea.

No, don't do that. If you can make sample data available for download,
or point to some accessible dataset somewhere, that'd work.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jerry Sievers 2018-10-24 09:40:59 Re: Oracle vs PG
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2018-10-24 08:37:48 Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?= 2018-10-24 09:36:41 Re: [PATCH] Tab complete EXECUTE FUNCTION for CREATE (EVENT) TRIGGER
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2018-10-24 08:37:48 Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index?