Re: autogenerating headers & bki stuff

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: autogenerating headers & bki stuff
Date: 2009-07-27 00:46:35
Message-ID: 19085.1248655595@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Introducing defaults for DATA() would bring some benefits because it
> would mostly avoid the need to change every row in the file when
> adding a new column. But a preprocessing script can do much more
> sophisticated transformations, like computing a value for a column, or
> looking up type names in another file and translating them into OIDs.

Hmm. A preprocessing script that produces DATA commands might in fact
be a reasonable proposal, but it was not what I understood you to be
suggesting before.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-07-27 00:52:47 Re: autogenerating headers & bki stuff
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-07-26 23:40:35 Re: generic explain options v3