From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Julien Tachoires <julmon(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Improving psql \ds |
Date: | 2012-10-07 22:20:38 |
Message-ID: | 19080.1349648438@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Julien Tachoires <julmon(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> About \ds behaviour, I think to add 2 columns :
> - 'LastValue'
> - 'Increment'
That would make the command a great deal slower, since it would have to
access each sequence to get that info. I don't object to adding such
columns to \ds+, but I don't think it's a good idea to put them in the
basic command.
The other problem you're going to have here is that there is in fact no
such command as "\ds" (nor "\ds+"); rather, it's a special case of
\dtsvi. As such, putting any relkind-specific info into the result is
problematic. I think you're going to have to invent a different command
if you want there to be sequence-specific columns.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomonari Katsumata | 2012-10-08 01:04:48 | more suitable messages for analyze on hot standby. |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2012-10-07 21:54:00 | Re: Bugs in CREATE/DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY |