Re: Nested transactions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Nested transactions
Date: 2003-03-18 14:30:38
Message-ID: 19061.1047997838@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at> writes:
> On COMMIT: end the current subtransaction (marking it as aborted in
> pg_clog), pop it from the stack, set the enclosing transaction to
> (SUB)TRANS_ABORT.

Surely not. The outer transaction must remain alive, else there's no
point in the whole thing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-03-18 14:30:51 Red Hat snubbed by Oracle
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar<shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in> 2003-03-18 14:22:42 Primary key and references