Re: Replication timeout units

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Replication timeout units
Date: 2011-12-20 15:34:29
Message-ID: 19016.1324395269@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> from postgresql.conf.sample:
> #replication_timeout = 60s # in milliseconds; 0 disables

> Seconds or milliseconds? I would suggest we just remove the "in
> milliseconds", and instead say "timeout for replication connections; 0
> disables".

That would take away any information about whether it could be set at
sub-second resolution. I don't like the current wording either, but
just removing the "in milliseconds" seems wrong.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2011-12-20 15:53:32 Re: Replication timeout units
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-12-20 15:32:40 Re: sync_seqscans in postgresql.conf