Re: pglz compression performance, take two

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pglz compression performance, take two
Date: 2020-12-26 15:10:20
Message-ID: 18a39267-341b-0424-2b05-9a0f54e55a9d@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/26/20 8:06 AM, Andrey Borodin wrote:
>
>
>> 12 дек. 2020 г., в 22:47, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> написал(а):
>>
>>
>
> I've cleaned up comments, checked that memory alignment stuff actually make sense for 32-bit ARM (according to Godbolt) and did some more code cleanup. PFA v2 patch.
>
> I'm still in doubt should I register this patch on CF or not. I'm willing to work on this, but it's not clear will it hit PGv14. And I hope for PGv15 we will have lz4 or something better for WAL compression.
>

I'd suggest registering it, otherwise people are much less likely to
give you feedback. I don't see why it couldn't land in PG14.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2020-12-26 15:21:31 Re: pgsql: Add pg_alterckey utility to change the cluster key
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2020-12-26 15:00:30 Re: pgsql: Add key management system