| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, "pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [DOCS] 8.2.0 pdf |
| Date: | 2006-12-09 17:57:40 |
| Message-ID: | 18994.1165687060@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-patches pgsql-www |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Jim Nasby wrote:
>> Also, if PDF indexes depend on HTML, perhaps HTML should be a
>> dependency of PDF in the Makefile.
> By that logic, HTML should also depend on HTML. I don't know how people
> would like that.
The real point is that the "jade" step needs to be done twice to have
up-to-date indexes. It makes sense not to force that for html, because
we use html for proofing. But perhaps we ought to run jade twice in the
Makefile rule for producing pdftex output? I see that the Makefile
forces three runs of TeX for similar reasons (which is probably way more
time than the jade part anyway).
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-12-09 18:18:46 | Re: Switching to XML |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-12-09 11:01:01 | Re: [DOCS] 8.2.0 pdf |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-12-10 12:57:01 | Re: [HACKERS] Configuring BLCKSZ and XLOGSEGSZ (in 8.3) |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-12-09 11:01:01 | Re: [DOCS] 8.2.0 pdf |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2006-12-10 16:44:04 | Re: 8.2.0 pdf |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-12-09 11:01:01 | Re: [DOCS] 8.2.0 pdf |