Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 10:05 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's possible to support this: the group
>> and the user will now really be the same entity, ie a role that has both
>> its own login privileges and members.
> Assuming you actually want to unify the two objects. That might well be
> the common case, but will it always be true?
As compared to what? I didn't like the notion of auto-renaming one of
the roles, if that's what you're suggesting. That seems well outside
pg_dump's charter.
regards, tom lane