From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: pg_logicalinspect: Fix possible crash when passing a directory p |
Date: | 2025-03-12 05:18:09 |
Message-ID: | 1896564.1741756689@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 7:08 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> This introduces a new compiler warning for compilers that don't know
>> the ereport(ERROR) does not return.
> Thank you for the report. Can we generate the warning using some gcc's
> warning flags? I'd like to add a check to my personal pre-commit test.
I don't know of an easy way. I experimented with doing this:
diff --git a/src/include/c.h b/src/include/c.h
index a14c6315162..467b1f58ae8 100644
--- a/src/include/c.h
+++ b/src/include/c.h
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@
#elif defined(_MSC_VER) && !defined(USE_ASSERT_CHECKING)
#define pg_unreachable() __assume(0)
#else
-#define pg_unreachable() abort()
+#define pg_unreachable() ((void) 0)
#endif
/*
which seems like it ought to be enough to provoke such warnings
(in assert-enabled builds). I got upwards of sixty build warnings
this way, but the place David mentions was *not* among them.
So I'm confused.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2025-03-12 06:38:50 | Re: pgsql: pg_logicalinspect: Fix possible crash when passing a directory p |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-03-12 04:56:14 | Re: pgsql: pg_logicalinspect: Fix possible crash when passing a directory p |